Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Strong-arm tactics alleged in Oracle, reseller dispute

Chris Kanaracus, IDG News Service | March 21, 2011
- Oracle explicitly said that it planned to sell products directly to its largest accounts after it acquired Sun Microsystems last year. But reseller Innovative Technology Distributors is claiming Oracle set about doing so in a way that "destroyed" ITD's business through unfair dealings, according to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

- Oracle explicitly said that it planned to sell products directly to its largest accounts after it acquired Sun Microsystems last year. But reseller Innovative Technology Distributors is claiming Oracle set about doing so in a way that "destroyed" ITD's business through unfair dealings, according to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Oracle, in turn, has filed a lawsuit against ITD in a California court, claiming the Edison, New Jersey, company owes it more than $19 million for products it was given.

ITD, which filed its suit March 10, had resold Sun Microsystems software and hardware since 2005, with annual revenue "well in excess" of $100 million and a client list including Motorola and Alcatel-Lucent, according to its complaint.

Oracle strung ITD along for much of last year, telling it that a new contract to replace the one it had with Sun was forthcoming, but all the while Oracle was planning to phase the company out, according to the complaint.

Finally, Oracle offered an amendment to ITD's existing agreement on Dec. 29, according to the complaint. But it had to be signed within a day, and its terms were onerous, according to ITD. It covered only a six-month period, eliminated previously provided discounts on products, and limited ITD to "essentially only two customers: Alcatel-Lucent and Motorola," the complaint states.

The deal was a "stop-gap, intended to benefit Oracle by providing it with more time to take direct those customers where ITD was most entrenched," it adds.

Despite its misgivings, ITD was "forced to sign under duress" because Oracle would not process certain orders placed by Alcatel-Lucent unless it did so, the complaint alleges.

Apart from the contract issue, day-to-day business became more difficult for ITD after Oracle bought Sun, according to the complaint.

Previously, ITD was able to obtain price quotes for customers within 24 hours, with shipments occurring quickly, the complaint states. But Oracle put a number of new procedures in place that slowed the process down considerably, according to ITD.

Product shipments were also hit by significant delays because Oracle "stopped ordering parts it needed in advance based on forecasts, and instead only ordered parts after customer purchase orders were received," the complaint states.

In addition, Oracle reneged on a promised deal that would have seen ITD take over some integration work done by its Customer Ready Systems division, the complaint alleges. The opportunity would have been worth $60 million to $80 million per year, according to ITD.

 

1  2  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.