Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Google hits out at banks in mobile wallet fight

Rohan Pearce | Aug. 31, 2016
Android Pay creator seems bemused at being named in banks’ application to ACCC

A submission to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) by Google Asia Pacific (GAP) argues that there is no basis for allowing banks to band together for negotiations over the Android Pay platform.

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, National Australia Bank and Westpac are seeking ACCC authorisation to engage in a limited form of cartel activity, engaging in collective negotiations with, and potentially limited boycott of, a number of mobile wallet providers.

In an application lodged with the ACCC in late July, the banks argued that some third party wallet providers "by reason of their scale and influence, combined with their control of key mobile hardware and/or operating systems, could be in a position to negotiate terms that would be likely to result in reduced competition and innovation, and increased risk in the security and transparency of mobile payments."

The application names three payment platforms: Google's Android Pay, Samsung Pay and Apple Pay.

As creator of the Android OS, Google has "significant bargaining power" in Android Pay negotiations, the application stated.

"There is no allegation or evidence in the Applications or submission that GAP or any other Google Entity has engaged in any conduct detrimental to the applicants or that an ability to negotiate collectively and engage in a collective boycott is required for negotiations relating to the Android Pay service," Google's deputy general counsel, Matthew Sucherman, wrote in a submission to the ACCC.

Sucherman said that the applicants hadn't claimed Google restricted use of the Android Near Field Communications interface, for example. The banks' application cites Apple restricting access to the iPhone's NFC antenna, which is can be used for contactless payments, as an example of a barrier to competition.

Sucherman added that there are numerous digital wallet services available on Android and the fact that Google is the developer of the platform "gives it no particular advantage" because of Android's open API for NFC. The submission also noted that Google does not charge card issuers for participating in Android Pay.

"Finally, there is no allegation or evidence that Android Pay inadequately protects against fraudulent activity," Sucherman added.

The submission asks that the ACCC seeks confirmation from that the bank's application is "not, in fact, intended to extend to negotiations with GAP for the Android Pay service". In the absence of such confirmation, Google requests that Android Pay not be part of any grant of authorisation.

"In addition, GAP reserves the right to submit a response to the Applications demonstrating that there is no basis on which authorisation should be granted in respect of any negotiations related to Android Pay," the submission added.

 

1  2  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.