Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Is 3G/4G slower indoors? Not as much as you might think

Gabe Scelta | May 27, 2013
Our recent 20-city tests of wireless service show that both 3G and 4G services slow down less than 10 percent indoors

In this year's wireless speed tests, TechHive and its testing partner OpenSignal focused on getting real-world results. That's why we used ordinary, readily available smartphones and tested in the physical spaces where real people use such devices, both inside and outside buildings.

Drive test metrics are great to have, and they help mobile carriers improve service and target problem areas on their networks. However, with over 34 percent of households in the United States claiming a mobile phone as their only phone, we know that most smartphone users are either at home or at work, presumably somewhere inside a building.

The results
In our tests, outdoor service was usually better than indoor service, but not by much. Both 4G and 3G service suffered an average speed loss of less than 0.7 megabits per second (700 kilobits per second), but that small difference turned into a big one for services where download speeds were less than 1 mbps to begin with.

Overall, 3G service showed marginal speed decreases when we used it indoors. Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon 3G speeds degraded by 5 to 9 percent in indoor usage. AT&T was an anomaly: Its 3G service produced download speeds that were 5.28 percent faster indoors than outdoors.

We saw more-pronounced differences when testing LTE service indoors and out. AT&T's and T-Mobile's respective LTE services worked much better outdoors, with speed advantages of 9.5 percent and 11 percent, effectively. Verizon LTE also worked better outside, but by only 2.8 percent. Sprint is the outlier here, as its new LTE service currently works slightly better indoors.

In general, though, users with LTE service will get far better indoor signal strength. Current 4G service, specifically LTE service at 700MHz (which most carriers use), penetrates buildings better because of its relatively lower frequency.

What you won't notice is an improvement in voice service, as that (for the moment) relies on 3G, even when you're using a 4G phone.

How and why
For the most part, cellular signals are just like any other radio waves--and just like AM/FM, they are susceptible to a number of external factors. The type of connection, the initial strength of the network, the surrounding building types and materials, and the general topography all conspire to make your connection worse or better.

We've found that large downtown areas generally have plenty of signal strength, but at ground level all those big buildings can get in the way, especially when you're using 3G service. However, if you are lucky enough to be farther up in a big building--as we were in a few of the testing locations in Ann Arbor, Atlanta, Boston, Kansas City, and Washington D.C.--you may be both vertically far enough away from some of the structural interference and closer to a rooftop tower that improves your signal.

 

1  2  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.