Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

How to spot a tech company that's about to lose

Rob Enderle | Sept. 22, 2014
The list of failed tech products and companies is a long one, from A (Apple server) to Z (Microsoft Zune). If you're buying IT products and services, you need to be able to spot potential failures. A firm's unwillingness to do whatever it takes to succeed should be a telltale sign.

Failure 178425369
Credit: Thinkstock

It's important to understand early on when an initiative won't succeed. Sometimes that isn't easy, but often you can look under the covers at a firm's effort and see that it simply won't reach critical mass.   While a company can get lucky, failure often has at its roots an unwillingness or inability to do what's required to win. In the context of the technology market, that ability to realize this applies to most any endeavor.

Several products top the list of failures that we really should have seen coming: Zune, IBM PCs, Apple servers, Netscape and Google +. I, for one, identified Apple servers and Netscape as early failures based on two simple criteria. First, firms must set budgets based on what's needed to succeed and no other factor. Second, there must be nothing (legal) that the firm isn't willing to do to succeed.

Companies Unwilling to Succeed Are Going to Fail
For example, Microsoft was unwilling to fund the Zune at a level that would let it replace an entrenched product, the iPod, and it was unwilling to find a legal way to seamlessly get music off the iPods and onto the Zune. Microsoft did create a subscription service, which would have addressed the licensing issue, but it never figured out a way to migrate people from iPod to Zune.

IBM wouldn't do what it took to succeed in the consumer market, which gives a vendor both volume and interest in the corporate segment. (Look at Apple.) From there, it was only a matter of time before IBM exited the PC market altogether. Lenovo bought IBM's struggling PC company in 2005, executed in both segments, funded to success and now leads the market. It very well may do the same after buying IBM's server business.

Apple needed to invest heavily in Gartner services if it wanted to its server efforts to be taken seriously. It also needed to transition its brand or create a new brand that could appear more business-focused, since servers don't sell under consumer brand. I actually gave Steve Jobs this advice, but he thought Gartner (and IT in general) was stupid and accused me of blackmail (I wasn't working for Gartner at the time). It skipped the brand work and didn't adequately invest in Gartner. The effort failed. Dell, meanwhile, transitioned its brand from consumers to business and now stands as a consistent leader in the server market.  

Netscape needed to monetize the Web as Yahoo, Google and Facebook did but instead went after the enterprise market, making acquisition after acquisition. Netscape was also unwilling, and eventually unable, to assure that what it sold actually worked. It's rare to see a company self-destruct as Netscape did. Netscape could have become Yahoo, Google, Facebook or even Amazon, as AWS offers a great example of how to approach the enterprise market from an Internet-focused start.

 

1  2  3  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.