Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Why patient portals remain healthcare's enigma

Brian Eastwood | Sept. 3, 2014
Healthcare's ongoing effort to fix patient engagement has been stymied by a widespread inability to improve patient portal adoption. In an era when consumers can do just about anything online, healthcare IT leaders are often at a loss to explain why so few patients – and physicians – embrace tools for online collaboration.

Healthcare's ongoing effort to fix patient engagement has been stymied by a widespread inability to improve patient portal adoption. In an era when consumers can do just about anything online, healthcare IT leaders are often at a loss to explain why so few patients and physicians embrace tools for online collaboration.

Portal use is about more than modernization, though. Under meaningful use stage 2, 5 percent of the patients that an eligible provider sees must use a patient portal to view, download or transmit to a third-party their electronic personal health information (ePHI). This is a core objective, which means it's mandatory, and it's one providers struggle to address only 10 percent of hospitals have met the view, download and transmit requirement.

Recent research points to a few reasons that patient portals aren't catching on, including poor usability, unresponsive clinical staff and a preference for telephone communications. The root cause, though, can be traced to one word: Marketing.

Separate surveys from Technology Advice and Software Advice indicate that between 33 and 40 percent of patients don't even know if their physician offers a patient portal. This compares to 32 to 50 percent of patients who do, in fact, know. Both research organizations see this as evidence that providers need to invest more time and resources into educating patients about portal availability.

"Doctors aren't geared toward marketing to their patients," says Cameron Graham, editorial coordinator for Technology Advice, adding that portals "can be hard to access, even to find sometimes."

Doctors Who Don't Use Portals Have Patients Who Don't Use Portals

It's a two-way street, however. Physicians must be willing to use the portals themselves. According to Technology Advice, they're not only 9 percent followed up with patients after a visit using portal, and only about 6 percent sent an email. (In this instance, payment or billing notification does not count as a follow-up.) That pales in comparison to follow-up phone calls (24 percent) or nothing at all (48 percent).

Patients prefer to hear from their physicians over the phone, even in matters of diagnoses or complex lab results. Email is second, Technology Advice says; online notification through a patient portal barely beats snail mail for third.

The Software Advice survey sheds some light on why this is the case. Asked to name their top frustration with patient portals, respondents cited "unresponsive staff" (34 percent) and "confusing interface" (33 percent) almost equally.

Two factors come into play here, Software Advice suggests. Many healthcare professionals are admittedly learning as they go, as electronic health record (EHR) use has quadrupled since 2001. On top of that, mandates such as meaningful use, the ICD-10 conversion and quality reporting strain clinical workflows enough on their own; adding to that a portal that patients statistically are unlikely to use therefore becomes a low priority.

 

1  2  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.