Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Why Microsoft must become Apple and Google

Brad Chacos | Jan. 31, 2013
Can't beat 'em? Then join 'em. Microsoft's future may lie in stealing the strategies of its most bitter rivals.

Juggling cross-platform software availability will be tricky for Microsoft. For example, how do you offer Office for the iPad without reducing the luster of Windows RT and Windows Phone 8, both of which tout access to free Office apps as a distinguishing feature? Nonetheless, as a software company, Redmond must have a presence on Android, iOS, and maybe even BlackBerry 10, as the world moves beyond the confines of Windows alone.

Et tu, Apple?

Windows still dominates the PC, and obviously Microsoft can't afford to let its flagship OS stagnate while it's busy expanding to other platforms. In fact, Microsoft should redouble its efforts to promote Windows 8 as more than just a 'tweener that straddles two disparate worlds. What's the best way to do that? Surface...lots more Surface.

There's no need for Microsoft to gulp down mouthfuls of Apple's Kool-Aid and completely kick its manufacturing partners to the curb, of course. No single supplier could satisfy the width and breadth of the PC ecosystem. But offering a wider range of Surface products would help Microsoft reduce its reliance on its hardware partners, and enable the company to take a direct role in molding the perception of Windows devices. This is what Google's Nexus devices do for Android. Hardware is just so visceral. It resonates in ways that software alone cannot.

That observation goes double in the case of Windows 8 and its finger-friendly modern UI. At CES, Windows business chief Tami Reller said that Microsoft feels the new-look Windows would have enjoyed stronger adoption out of the gate if more touchscreen devices had been available at its launch. And the Register recently ran a report (based on anonymous sources) claiming that Microsoft secretly blames its OEM partners' touchscreen qualms for Windows 8's less-than-explosive debut.

Regardless of whether Microsoft's hindsight is accurate, expanding the Surface brand would allow the company to strategically counter similar concerns in the future. An expanded Surface lineup would help Microsoft in another crucial area, as well: mindshare.

If Microsoft wants consumers to look at its operating system as more than a piece of preinstalled shovelware, Windows needs heroes. Windows needs shining stars. Simply put, Windows needs Macs--paragons of design that represent the perfect marriage of beautiful hardware and highly functional underlying software.

Few mainstream OEMs achieve reference-quality designs on a par with Apple's finest. But with the first wave of Surface tablets, Microsoft has proved that it can make hardware that's both thoughtful and attractive, and Microsoft's advertising budget is large enough to bring the company's products to mainstream attention--another feat that few of Redmond's manufacturing partners can accomplish. A strong Surface lineup could deliver a cohesive response to Macs and finally provide Windows with a true brand identity, lifting the OS above the usual free-for-all hardware hodgepodge.


Previous Page  1  2  3  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.