There's no question domestic outsourcing is more expensive than sending IT services abroad. The 215 enterprise buyers surveyed in the September 2012 report expect to save about 16 percent when sourcing work stateside versus around 22 percent when sending work to India. But the cost effectiveness was just one of the most important criteria when deciding where to outsource IT services; workforce skills and experience, availability of qualified workers, and English-speaking capabilities were also major factors, according to the survey.
The corporate leaders also said they would consider outsourcing domestically if the costs savings were at least 15 percent while they would consider offshoring to India only for savings of at least 30 percent.
"That's a key finding. Those are big differentials," says HfS Research founder Phil Fersht. "If you go to a service provider, they should be able to give you two options--local or international sourcing."
The contrast between in capabilities between India and U.S.-based outsourcing was stark in several areas. While 78 percent of respondents said domestic outsourcing arrangements offered good cultural understanding and communication skills, just 30 percent said Indian deals did.
Likewise 72 percent gave the U.S. good marks for business understanding and taking initiative, while 37 and 38 percent gave the same responses for India. And 71 percent said U.S.-based outsourcing deals were innovative, while 41 percent said Indian deals were.
Respondents reported a more favorable playing field in terms of work ethic--77 percent gave the U.S. high marks for being hard wording while 71 percent said the same for India. And it was nearly a dead heat in process adherence, an attribute often associated with Indian IT firms; 72 percent said Indian outsourcing engagements were process-driven while 71 percent said their U.S. counterparts were.
IT Service Providers Reluctant to Go Domestic The problem is that many providers can't or won't offer viable domestic outsourcing options--at least not at the scale that they currently do in India or other overseas locations.
"The service providers haven't invested an awful lot in building up those local resources because they've been going offshore," says Fersht. "Buyers may not want to move more work offshore, but they don't have a lot of choice from the industry today."
Traditional U.S.-based providers may have an advantage; while they have invested heavily offshore, they have retained onshore personnel. "Some of them are sensing an opportunity to win back work from Indian providers," says Fersht. Many Indian providers, on the other hand, are reluctant to build up a robust presence in the local markets they serve.
Their U.S.-based operations have largely been driven by specific client engagements. "They're not internationalizing enough. They still want to run everything out of India," says Fersht. "And when they are running projects locally, they still want their Indian staff to run them."
Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.