Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Toshiba Q300 SSD review: Not the bargain it should be

Jon L. Jacobi | Nov. 10, 2015
It's decent with smaller files but the Q300 gasses out on large data sets.

q300

Every once in a while I run across a product that makes me shake my head and ask... Why? Toshiba’s TLC NAND-based Q300 2.5-inch SATA 6Mbps SSD, unfortunately, is one of those.

Basically the same drive that the company released under the OCZ label as the Trion (another head-shaker), the Q300 suffers the same precipitous decline in performance when writing larger amounts of data. Precipitous as in “falls off a freakin’ cliff.”

If you think I’m exaggerating the performance drop-off, look at the graphic below.

q300 
In the above 20GB write operation, MLC SATA 6Gbps SSDs will start at 400Mbps or more and stay there throughout the process. The Q300 does not.  Credit: Jon L. Jacobi

But the sustained write drop-off is not the real issue, because, as with most TLC (triple-level cell/3-bit) drives, the Q300’s day-to-day read performance and write performance with smaller file sets is fine. And, as annoying as it may be when it occurs, you’ll probably only experience this type of slowdown once in a while. 

The elephant in the room is the Q300’s price: $450 for the 960GB model, $310 for 480GB, $160 for 240GB, and $100 for 120GB. There are cheaper MLC (multi-level cell/2-bit) drives available that don’t suffer performance problems under any circumstance.

Slow NAND, partially compensated for

The performance problem stems from the slow single-layer TLC NAND that’s used for the majority of the storage. Toshiba augments it with small amount of DRAM and faster SLC (single-level cell/1-bit) cache, but as with other drives employing TLC, the amount is rather small. Toshiba declined my request for information on cache sizes, but the OCZ Trion produced by Toshiba had 14GB of SLC in the 960GB; 7GB in the 480GB drive; and a mere 3GB in the 240GB and 120GB models. 

When the amount of data you’re writing to the drive exceeds the size of the faster cache, speed plummets to that of a hard drive. You can see the phenomenon in the screen capture at the head of the article. Samsung’s 850 EVO exhibits somewhat the same behavior, but drops only from about 500MBps to 300MBps because its V-NAND TLC is a heck of a lot faster.

Toshiba might have expected better reviews. Everything looked just fine for the Q300 with CrystalDiskMark 5.02, reading at over 500MBps and writing nearly as fast. The non-threaded AS SSD numbers (below) looked fine as well with 1GB data sets (dark purple), but look at the 10GB numbers (medium purple)—the drop-off is astonishing.

as ssd 
(Longer bars are better). Click on image to enlarge. Credit: Jon L. Jacobi

 

1  2  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.