Tomb Raider Performance
Even though 3DMark is a very reliable test, it’s still synthetic. People want to see performance based on actual game play. I ran the numbers in Tomb Raider set to Ultimate quality level and 1920x1080 resolution.
The results mostly mirror the 3DMark scores: GTX 1080 is on top by a comfortable margin, followed by GTX 1070, GTX 980, GTX 1060 and then GTX 980m and GTX 970m.
Rise of the Tomb Raider Performance
Tomb Raider is an elderly game at this point, so I also crunched the numbers in the fairly new Rise of the Tomb Raider. At 1920x1080, the Omen 17 is pushing nearly 95 fps, far more than you need. The bad news? It’s about 10 percent slower than the Asus G752VS OC Edition, which I’d attribute to the higher clock speeds of the GPU in that model. I didn’t happen to have scores for the GTX 980m and GTX 970m available in this test, but you can assume both of them would be slower.
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 4K performance
As the Omen 17 has a 4K display I also wanted to see how it would game at its native resolution. For that I fired up Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor with the 4K textures installed. The performance, again, just trails the Asus G752VS OC Edition a tad. It’s not huge, but it’s still roughly 5 percent slower.
Rise of the Tomb Raider 4K performance
I also ran Rise of the Tomb Raider at 4K set to Very High. The result drags the laptops down even further. In fact, I’d recommend trimming some game settings if you really want to play on the Omen 17. At this resolution, you really need at least a GTX 1080 to hit the magical 60 fps. The good news for the Omen 17 is that 4K panel supports G-Sync, which smooths out low frame rates exceptionally well. It’s enough that playing games in the 40 fps range isn’t as atrocious as you might imagine.
Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.