Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

The Tizen smartphone flopped -- and open source is to blame

Galen Gruman | July 30, 2014
A parade of failed open source smartphone OSes should cause the open source community to rethink its mobile strategy.

You know the saying: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Now that Samsung has "indefinitely" delayed the launch of its first Tizen smartphone, can anyone believe any more open source mobile promises?

Open source mobile efforts have a history of failure: Moblin, Maemo, MeeGo, and Tizen are all examples that have been shepherded into oblivion by the Linux Foundation and an assembly of vendors. Canonical's Ubuntu Touch, Mozilla'sFirefox OS, and Jolla's Sailfish (derived from MeeGo) all seem to be following similar trajectories to nowhere.

Most open source mobile efforts haven't been that serious
The open source Tizen OS has been delayed many times over the last three years, bouncing from Nokia to Intel to Samsung and apparently not going anywhere despite all that movement. Its current mission is to power devices in the Internet of things, which is everything's mission these days. It's an easy aspiration in which to hide a sputtering project.

A year ago, Canonical made a lot of noise about its Ubuntu Touch open source OS, with promises of smartphones in early 2014 -- but the phones haven't appeared. More telling, the Ubuntu Touch material on the Canonical's website is woefully out of date (shipping in late 2013? -- uh uh) or furiouslty backpedaling on when the first smartphones will supposedly ship, and Ubuntu Touch was nowhere on the agenda at last week's OSCON open source conference, which a year ago trumpeted the Canonical mobile OS.

The Sailfish effort seems more of a hobby by former Nokia engineers who can't let go of their MeeGo ambitions. It's all about aspiration, not devices. Or progress.

If any of these open source smartphones has a shot in the market, it's the Mozilla Firefox OS, which is available on real devices in several countries from Alcatel, Hauwei, LG, and ZTE. They don't show up in any market surveys or mobile Web traffic surveys, so sales are very tiny. But at least there are real Firefox OS smartphones in the wild.

What is it about the mobile world that has led to the parade of open source OSes that go nowhere? There are several reasons, which combine in varying degrees for each project.

One reason, I believe, is that these are treated as hobbyist engineering projects, not commercial endeavors. Volunteers (often unpaid) end up doing much of the work, so it becomes about them. That seems to be the issue at Sailfish and Canonical (whose desktop Linux ambitions have also sputtered). The open source community usually sees major fragmentation and stalling-out as a result of this "what I want" reality. We tend to forget that the vast majority of open source efforts go nowhere. When the community comes together under strong leadership, amazing things can happen. But that's a relatively rare occurrence, especially for a project as complex as a mobile OS.


1  2  3  4  Next Page 

Sign up for CIO Asia eNewsletters.